RAG Rubric
RAG Rubric Score each area from 0 to 4. Area Score Evidence : Ingestion supports realistic documents Chunking strategy is justified Metadata is preserved Retrieval is measurable Hy
RAG Rubric
Score each area from 0 to 4.
| Area | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Ingestion supports realistic documents | ||
| Chunking strategy is justified | ||
| Metadata is preserved | ||
| Retrieval is measurable | ||
| Hybrid search or reranking is considered | ||
| Citations are accurate | ||
| Access control is enforced | ||
| Prompt injection risks are tested | ||
| Evaluation dataset exists | ||
| Failure cases are documented |
Strong RAG Evidence
- Retrieval precision and recall report.
- Citation correctness examples.
- Permission-denied tests.
- No-answer behavior.
- Chunking comparison notes.